So the lockdown policies to prevent health services being overwhelmed are needed and do have my support.Nobody even knows how many people western forces themselves killed directly.To add to that you have to add those who died in subsequent conflict engendered by the forced dismantling of the state the West disapproved of.
Some were killed by western proxies, some by anti-western forces, and some just by those reverting to ancient tribal hostility and battle for resources into which the country had been regressed by bombing. Iraq lost in the destruction 60 of its potable drinking water, 75 of its medical facilities and 80 of its electricity. This very sober analysis from Salon makes a stab at 2.4 million for Iraqi deaths caused by the war. Since several major cities in Iraq and Syria fell to Islamic State in 2014, the U.S. A recent project to remove rubble and recover bodies in just one neighborhood found 3,353 more bodies, of whom only 20 were identified as ISIS fighters and 80 as civilians. Another 11,000 people in Mosul are still reported missing by their families. It really is very difficult indeed to quantify the number of people killed as a direct result of the policy of liberal intervention in these countries. Legendary anarchist class mod codeThe destruction of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria launched a wave of refugee migration which led to politicial instability throughout Europe and contributed to, among many other consequences, Brexit. The total number of deaths from coronavirus in the UK so far is about half the number of civilians killed directly by the US military in the single city of Mosul. Large general population sampling antibody studies are now just beginning to emerge, and I feel reasonably confident that I was in fact correct that the mortality rate of coronavirus is under 1, and probably not too different from the 0.5 generally quoted for Hong Kong flu. The term infection fatality rate is now being used to describe this true mortality rate. Download 2008 sidekick themesI must say I have found it alarmingly difficult to explain to people the rather simple concept that you cannot infer a mortality rate among everybody who catches the disease, from the results you get when by definition you have only been offering tests to the most acute cases presenting as needing serious treatment. Of course a fair proportion of the worst cases dont make it through the disease. But there is a population of millions in the UK (and nobody has a serious idea how many) who have had the disease with no or mild symptoms, and who do not figure in the statistics. Now these are preliminary studies, though almost all from reputable institutions. Proper, large scale, antibody testing programmes to produce peer reviewed and authoritatively published studies are on the way, but not here yet. I repeat, though, that I think the infection mortality rate is somewhere below 1. So a far higher percentage of the population get it, all at once. Over two seasons, only about 30 of the UK population got the Hong Kong flu. Unchecked, it seems this coronavirus can spread very much quicker than that.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorDeshawn ArchivesCategories |